Re: Best way to request a backport

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 07:30 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Not strictly a "test" question but.....
> 
> I rebuilt NetworkManager-0.9.10.0-6.git20140704 from F21 for F20 and
> installed it.  After 2 days I have not seen
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059597.  It normally
> crops up within 6 hrs of a reboot.  So, I've fairly high confidence
> that this has fixed the issue.
> 
> How best to go about asking for NetworkManager-0.9.10.0-6 be
> officially added to F20?  I've made a note in the bugzilla....but
> there doesn't appear to have been any activity on bug since being
> reported back in January.

Bugzilla is usually the best way, I guess Dan hasn't had time for this
one yet :( I'll try and bring it to his attention.

I mentioned this on the bug, but 0.9.9.0 -> 0.9.10.0 is a major upgrade
and probably too dangerous a change in a core component like NM for a
stable release. What would be better is if we can identify the specific
commit that fixes the bug, and backport that fix.

Thanks, and sorry we didn't get to the report before now.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux