On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 12:04 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > On 2014-07-18 08:45 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed: > > > On Thu, 2014-07-17 at 20:53 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > > >> On 2014-07-17 20:41 (GMT-0400) Adam Williamson composed: > > >>> Bugzilla does not provide a backtrack from > >>> an attachment to a bug report, infuriatingly. > > >> A convenient link to click, you're right, it has none. But there is a way. > >> Simply append &action=edit to the attachment URL and you will get a page that > >> provides a link to the bug it's attached to. > > > Hah, nice workaround, I should've thought of that. thanks. > > You're welcome. I never remember it directly. I have to open a bug page with > an attachment and see what the attachment edit link points to. > > Now if you can, provide a workaround for the inane bugzilla.redhat.com > policy, found on no other Bugzilla installation I've ever encountered, that > requires a bazillion hoops be negotiated to get any attachment loaded into > the tab in which the bug page is loaded. Do the Redhat Bugzilla maintainers > think all its users are running Windows sans malware defenses? What is that > policy really supposed to be protecting? :-p Set the attachment type to text/plain . Bugzilla's auto-detection is terrible and always sets it to something silly which browsers don't want to open directly. I think I've seen this on other Bugzillas, though? I don't think it's unique to RH's? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
