On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 14:09 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 23:07:12 +0400, > Igor Gnatenko <ignatenkobrain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >Hi, > >On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:20 AM, Mike Ruckman <roshi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> # F21 Blocker Review meeting #1 > >> # Date: 2014-07-09 > >> # Time: 17:00 UTC (13:00 EST, 10:00 PST) > >> # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.neteria > >> ... > >> == > >> // Mike > >> Fedora QA > >> irc: roshi | twitter: roshi_fedora > >> blog: roshi.fedorapeople.org > >Why this msg not going to the test-announce@? :P > > I don't think the meeting log needs to go to test-announce. If the complaint > is really about the meeting notice, then that is arguably a reasonable > suggestion. This isn't meeting minutes. > Well folks, it's that time again. Throughout the planning process for > Fedora.next, we've been able to identify some potential blockers and we > should review them. As of today there are 13 proposed blockers and one > proposed FE for F21 Alpha. The full list can be found here: > https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/21/alpha/buglist -- -Igor Gnatenko
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
