Re: Proposed generic release criterion: service manipulation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/04/2014 03:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Still working on Fedora 21 release criteria. It seems to me that
> there's one area currently lacking in the criteria which all the
> Products would probably like us to have, hence I'm proposing it as
> a new 'generic' criterion, not Product-specific. We still haven't
> figured out exactly how to present the criteria, so for now I'm
> proposing this one be added as a new Fedora 21 Alpha criterion,
> i.e. it goes to 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Alpha_Release_Criteria
> (under "Post-install requirements"). Here's the proposed
> criterion:
> 
> System service manipulation
> 
> It must be possible to start, stop, enable and disable system
> services using the initialization framework's standard commands.
> 
> I don't think it needs any footnotes beyond standard 'References'.
> 
> Does this seem reasonable to everyone? Thanks!
> 

Is this another way of saying "All services must provide a systemd
unit file"?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlO6kdAACgkQeiVVYja6o6PkbQCgiLgJXavnOMbboQQGVPd8MIZo
MqgAoJx2GR2vEU/78KCIfevRNhsh2dY7
=ouCo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux