On 18.06.2014 07:50, bitlord wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 04:41:04 +0200
poma <pomidorabelisima@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 17.06.2014 11:45, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:13 AM, poma <pomidorabelisima@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
[...]
Get a backtrace and file a bug.
$ backtrace
bash: backtrace: command not found...
# dnf install backtrace
No package backtrace available.
Error: Nothing to do.
$ touch bug
xfdesktop 4.11 runs OK.
$ rpm -q xfce4-dev-tools \
libxfce4util \
libxfce4ui \
xfce4-about \
garcon \
xfce4-panel \
xfwm4 \
xfdesktop
xfce4-dev-tools-4.11.0-1.fc21.x86_64
libxfce4util-4.11.0-1.fc21.x86_64
libxfce4ui-4.11.1-1.fc21.x86_64
xfce4-about-4.11.1-1.fc21.x86_64
garcon-0.3.0-1.fc21.x86_64
xfce4-panel-4.11.0-1.fc21.x86_64
xfwm4-4.11.1-1.fc21.x86_64
xfdesktop-4.11.6-1.fc21.x86_64
poma
Take a look at this
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/StackTraces
Thanks for reference but we are here on rawland.
To poke with a backstreet of a progy is really not an issue here.
I hope you and drago understood the context here, now.
Toward Xfce 4.12
http://git.xfce.org/xfce/xfdesktop/plain/NEWS
poma
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
