On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 12:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Per-role functional requirements are certainly something we could add, > and probably a good idea, but they'd have to be done as part of actually > creating the roles. We don't have a DNS server role yet, and it's not in > the set of two roles planned for Fedora 21: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server/Technical_Specification#Supported_Roles . Those are domain controller and database server. So thinking about this some more, I think the way it could work is to have the criteria say something like: "Primary supported server roles must meet their functional requirements." and have it a required part of the server role process that server roles *have* functional requirements - presumably we'll require some kind of documentation of server roles, as wiki pages in a standardized category/naming format or whatever, and the functional requirements can be a part of that. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
