On Tue, 27 May 2014 07:58:55 -0400 Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: <snip> > > Yeah. If something isn't working, do you think the best path is QA->WG > directly, or should it be QA says something to FESCo, FESCo works > with WG? > > Since parts of this are new to all of us, and other parts new to a > lot of us, maybe it'd be good to put suggested/reasonable deadlines > on some parts of the responsibilities? That helps put in focus what > needs to be done. > > FWIW, I think it makes the most sense from a collaboration standpoint to have QA and the WGs talk directly. Having fewer steps to go through makes things go faster. // Mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
