On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 07:18:37AM +0200, poma wrote:
> On 08.05.2014 16:05, Peter Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 08:21:44AM +0200, poma wrote:
> >>
> >> $ rpmbuild -ba ./SPECS/syslinux.spec
> >> ...
> >>
> >> $ find -name syslinux*.rpm
> >> ./SRPMS/syslinux-6.02-4.fc21.src.rpm
> >> ./RPMS/x86_64/syslinux-perl-6.02-4.fc21.x86_64.rpm
> >> ./RPMS/x86_64/syslinux-6.02-4.fc21.x86_64.rpm
> >> ./RPMS/x86_64/syslinux-devel-6.02-4.fc21.x86_64.rpm
> >> ./RPMS/x86_64/syslinux-extlinux-6.02-4.fc21.x86_64.rpm
> >>
> >>
> >> # rpm -ivh $(ls ./RPMS/x86_64/syslinux*.rpm)
> >> error: Failed dependencies:
> >> syslinux-nonlinux = 6.02-4.fc21 is needed by syslinux-6.02-4.fc21.x86_64
> >> syslinux-extlinux-nonlinux = 6.02-4.fc21 is needed by syslinux-extlinux-6.02-4.fc21.x86_64
> >>
> >>
> >> Peter, why these three noarches are not built on x86_64?
> >> - syslinux-extlinux-nonlinux-6.02-4.fc21.noarch.rpm
> >> - syslinux-nonlinux-6.02-4.fc21.noarch.rpm
> >> - syslinux-tftpboot-6.02-4.fc21.noarch.rpm
> >
> > Because that'll result in a different 32-bit build on i686 vs x86_64.
> > Get them from the i686 build.
> >
>
> OK, can you explain this[5]?
I can't - can you reproduce this with mock build instead of just raw
rpmbuild with the target set? When I use mock or koji to build them, I
get syslinux64.exe in one and syslinux.exe in the -nonlinux one.
That's still a (minor) packaging bug, but it shouldn't be a
conflict.
--
Peter
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
