On Ter, 2014-04-22 at 20:45 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 04/22/2014 08:06 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Ter, 2014-04-22 at 18:39 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:37:26AM +0200, drago01 wrote: > >>> Port pdftk to openjdk? > > > >> I am not sure if there is really anything to port. At > >> http://www.pdflabs.com/docs/install-pdftk-on-redhat-or-centos/ > >> you can find pdftk-2.02-1.el6.src.rpm. I do not now about rawhide > >> but out of curiosity I tried on a Fedora 20 installation: > >> > >> rpmbuild --rebuild pdftk-2.02-1.el6.src.rpm > >> > >> OTOH after light testing > >> pdftk binary seems to work just fine and it appears to be somwewhat > >> faster then the one from pdftk-1.44-11.fc19.x86_64 (the last one > >> available on Fedora 64-bits mirrors) although I did not try to do any > >> measurements. > > > > So pdftk 2.02 already port to openjdk ! , > > we could undeprecated pdftk [1] and update to 2.02, checking pdftk.spec > > from 2.02 is pretty cool spec > > No, it isn't. It still uses gcj, still bundles lots of java. Sorry , I don't know where I had my mind BuildRequires: gcc BuildRequires: gcc-java BuildRequires: libgcj BuildRequires: libgcj-devel BuildRequires: gcc-c++ #Requires: jre-gcj Requires: libstdc++ libgcj so I was trying rebuild pdftk-1.44-11.fc19 with openjdk , when I mixed up things compiling pdftk.spec ends up with attachments.cc:33:21: fatal error: gcj/cni.h: No such file or directory #include <gcj/cni.h> ^ when I saw that pdftk have a major update, I though in a miracle :) Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
