On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 18:47 -0700, Gregory Maxwell wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX <caf@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > According to the announcement, that version is vulnerable. >> > Of the 1.01 versions, only 1.01g is saf(er). >> >> RedHat backported the fix as the openssl in fedroda/rhel is carrying a >> ton of patches. >> >> I expect this is going to cause a lot of confusion. > > I don't see why. Backporting security fixes is standard procedure and > has been for decades. It would be extremely irresponsible to just shove > out a new and untested openssl build as a stable update. Just because it has the attention of less experienced people. I've now seen confusion about Fedora being fixed in two places. Just a data point. I don't think that any different behavior is advisable. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
