On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 21:39 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Wed, 09 Apr 2014 12:00:54 +1000 > Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > > The update has been available since yesterday afternoon. You have to > > > restart your services after installing it. > > > > So, I tried to update openssl as the announcement suggested. I > > couldn't do it via dnf: > > > > http://paste.fedoraproject.org/92743/70087521 > > > > Yum worked just fine: > > http://paste.fedoraproject.org/92744/13970085 > > > > Is something the matter with dnf's solver? Bug worth filing? > > it is how dnf is designed to work. it refreshes the cache in the > background periodically. so wont have the new metadata. "dnf clean > metadata" followed by "dnf update" should have worked okay. It's a side > effect and design decision of dnf. I don't see what metadata has to do with it, it's a simple transaction to update two package files that exist locally. No repo metadata ought to be involved. If it works with yum it should work with dnf. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
