----- Original Message ----- > From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov" <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases" <test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 1:13:25 PM > Subject: Re: How to calculate priority for missing tests or %check > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Alexander Todorov" <atodorov@xxxxxxxxxx> > > To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases" > > <test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 12:54:42 PM > > Subject: How to calculate priority for missing tests or %check > > > > Hi guys, > > I've started working to identify packages with missing upstream test suites > > or > > not running the tests in %check. Having a list of hundreds of packages now > > I > > need to prioritize them somehow. This will help in later steps when spec > > files > > need to be fixed or somebody wants to start working with upstream on > > writing > > a > > test suite. > > > > My idea is to take all bugs against Fedora in the last few years (or > > releases). > > Packages with bigger number of bugs receive higher priority than those with > > less. Then based on this prioritize. > > > > > > How long should the time frame be? I'm thinking 3 to 5 years. > > > > > > Where low/medium/high priority boundaries are ? (could be 30%, 60%, 90% for > > example). > > > > > > Do you have other ideas how to calculate priority of these items? > > My starting point would be from dependency POV. Packages with more > dependencies (repoquery is your friend) can break more things if broken thus > deserve more testing. To clarify ordering based on the number of packages depending on the given one. > > Alexander Kurtakov > Red Hat Eclipse team > > > > > > > Thanks, > > Alex > > -- > > test mailing list > > test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test > -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
