On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 11:45 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2014-02-04 at 12:54 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 20:50 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > Does this imply that we'll have to run dnf check-update, dnf > > > update and compare the package lists to find packages with broken deps > > > to give negative karma to for testing? > > > > > > > Comments from upstream on the bug suggest we use --best to get > > information on dep errors. dnf by default will not display these since > > they're apparently troublesome to the user. > > Ideally of course we should be catching these with automation. But if > dnf usage becomes really widespread before we get > taskotron/depcheck-nextgen in place, we should add this info to the > updates-testing guide. thanks! I just went ahead and added a note - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing . -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
