================================== #fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting ================================== Meeting started by adamw at 16:02:45 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-27/fedora-qa.2014-01-27-16.02.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll call (adamw, 16:02:55) * Previous meeting follow-up (adamw, 16:05:55) * "adamw to post a summary of our position on EOL to the FESCo ticket" - I did that, see https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1198#comment:42 (adamw, 16:06:44) * "adamw to post a mail to test@ highlighting things we can be working on during the 'quiet time'" - did that too, see https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2014-January/120167.html , thanks to viking for adding another suggestion (adamw, 16:07:57) * Viking-Ice and roshi have started working on the QA community role which merges bugtriaging and testing process QA community member (adamw, 16:09:41) * SELinux update discussion (adamw, 16:13:30) * brunowolff notes 'make selinux updates spend longer in testing' is a commonly suggested short term approach (adamw, 16:22:34) * cmurf suggests per-package defaults for update release criteria (adamw, 16:22:44) * kparal suggests re-evaluating autopush and a minimum updates-testing time for certain updates (adamw, 16:23:13) * pingou suggests disallowing push to stable until update has made it to -testing (adamw, 16:25:18) * AGREED: while there are various little tweaks that could be considered to the update policy and process as a 'response' to this, we don't think any of them obviously solves the problem without causing other problems, and we trust the selinux maintainers to configure their updates more conservatively in future (adamw, 16:40:31) * Unmaintained package discussion (adamw, 16:40:40) * ACTION: viking-ice to look at a possible process for flagging bitrotten packages as part of the larger triage process proposal (adamw, 16:59:59) * open floor (adamw, 17:01:08) Meeting ended at 17:02:48 UTC. Action Items ------------ * viking-ice to look at a possible process for flagging bitrotten packages as part of the larger triage process proposal Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * viking-ice to look at a possible process for flagging bitrotten packages as part of the larger triage process proposal People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * adamw (79) * Viking-Ice (50) * cmurf (48) * nirik (25) * kparal (16) * brunowolff (14) * pingou (7) * misc (5) * roshi (5) * zodbot (4) * garretraziel (2) * tflink (2) * pschindl (2) * mkrizek (1) * haraldh (1) * pwhalen (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
