Re: Did anyone's F20 system randomly "reboot" after updating from updates-testing just recently?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 01/16/2014 08:49 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:

On Jan 16, 2014, at 7:44 AM, Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Jan 16, 2014, at 7:14 AM, Dan Mossor <dan.mossor@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On 01/16/2014 01:10 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
There's something off somewhere. I just fresh installed from the Alpha USB
stick I had. I ran a dnf update which went OK, other than the usbmuxd
scriptlet failure which iirc is a known issue. After that, I got down to
installing my other packages and I get quite a few scriptlet failures now:

   1 warning: %post(perl-libs-4:5.18.2-289.fc20.x86_64) scriptlet failed,
exit status 127

<Snipped>

I ran into this problem yesterday myself on a fresh install. It first cropped up during the update to KDE 4.12, and I asked Rex Dieter in the KDE channel about it. I managed to copy the output from the sddm install, and this is our brief convo about it. He seems to think it is a systemd problem:

[12:05] <danofsatx> Non-fatal POSTIN scriptlet failure in rpm package sddm-0.2.0-16.20130914git50ca5b20,fc29,x86_64
[12:05] * rdieter checks sddm packaging
[12:06] <danofsatx> warning: %post(sddm-0.2.0-16.20130914git50ca5b20,fc29.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 127
[12:06] <rdieter> odd, looks like systemd's fault
[12:06] <rdieter> it just has:  %systemd_post sddm.service
[12:07] <rdieter> hrm, maybe missing runtime dep
[12:07] <rdieter> nope, %{?systemd_requires}
[12:08] <rdieter> wierd

I did a final update last night to bring everything up to speed with the updates-testing repo enabled, and got this output - it's too much to paste in the email so it's on paste.fedora:
http://paste.fedoraproject.org/68957/89881516/

Summarization: I'm getting A LOT of scriptlet failures with exit status 127. Any clues what that exit status means, and what's broken?

Me too. It can't be systemd-208-11 because I don't have that installed, I still have the original one F20 installs with which is 208-9. I haven't tracked down what's causing this but it must be something in u-t.

Who having this problem has *NOT* been using dnf?

Chris Murphy

I forgot to mention that - I haven't typed the letters dnf at all on this system until I wrote this email.

Yum is what I know, yum is what I use.

Also forgot to mention that I have systemd-208-9.fc20.x86_64

--
Dan Mossor
Systems Engineer at Large
Fedora QA Team Volunteer FAS: dmossor IRC: danofsatx
San Antonio, Texas, USA
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux