And today I can't replicate it ... bizarre - must have hit some bad metadata or something perhaps ...
If I see it happening again I'll file the bz with the debug logs.
On 22 November 2013 21:45, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It sounds like a bug to me. I'd file it against yum with the completeOn Fri, 2013-11-22 at 13:16 +0000, James Hogarth wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Following discussion about journald and rsyslog I recently removed
> rsyslog (system is f19 upgraded to f20 via fedup).
>
> There is nothing listed on my system as having a dependency on
> rsyslog.
>
> Doing yum update results in the system wanting to install (yes install
> explicitly) rsyslog as a new leaf node.
>
> With debug set to 5 it l looks like it is picking it for install out
> of a 'standard' group but plenty of other packages in that group (such
> as ed) are skipped...
>
> My understanding was that if you did a yum remove rsyslog it should be
> fine and array gone unless a dependency pulled it in.
>
> What am I missing or is this a bug?
console output, to start with.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
