Re: [Test-Announce] 2013-11-14 @ **17:00 UTC** - F20 Final Blocker Bug Review #1.5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Here are the minutes from the meeting. The next meeting will probably be on Wednesday 2013-11-20, maybe on Monday after regular QA meeting. We will announce it in advance.


==========================================
#fedora-blocker-review: F20-blocker-review
==========================================


Meeting started by kparal at 17:00:54 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-11-14/f20-blocker-review.2013-11-14-17.00.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call  (kparal, 17:00:54)

* Introduction  (kparal, 17:04:12)
  * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
    nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
    the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have
    bugs.  (kparal, 17:04:12)
  * We'll be following the process outlined at:  (kparal, 17:04:12)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
    (kparal, 17:04:12)
  * The bugs up for review today are available at:  (kparal, 17:04:14)
  * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current   (kparal,
    17:04:16)
  * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at:  (kparal,
    17:04:18)
  * LINK:
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Alpha_Release_Criteria
    (kparal, 17:04:20)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Beta_Release_Criteria
    (kparal, 17:04:22)
  * LINK:
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Final_Release_Criteria
    (kparal, 17:04:24)
  * 7 Proposed Blockers  (kparal, 17:04:37)
  * 11 Accepted Blockers  (kparal, 17:04:37)
  * 4 Proposed Freeze Exceptions  (kparal, 17:04:37)
  * 0 Accepted Freeze Exceptions  (kparal, 17:04:37)
  * Proposed Blockers  (kparal, 17:05:03)

* (1029790) dracut cannot handle encrypted partitions with a key file on
  the root file system  (kparal, 17:05:12)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029790   (kparal,
    17:05:12)
  * Proposed Blocker, dracut, NEW  (kparal, 17:05:12)
  * AGREED: 1029790 - RejectedBlocker - This does not affect a large
    enough user base to guarantee a blocker. We still would like to see
    this fixed before release. If the fix is ready during freeze period,
    please propose for a freeze exception.  (kparal, 17:14:25)

* (1025908) unable to unlock LUKS encrypted device from Live-Desktop
  (kparal, 17:14:36)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025908   (kparal,
    17:14:36)
  * Proposed Blocker, gnome-disk-utility, NEW  (kparal, 17:14:36)
  * AGREED: 1025908 - RejectedBlocker - Currently this seems to be very
    hard to hit, and therefore rejected as a blocker. Please repropose
    if you find a reliable reproducer.  (kparal, 17:19:22)

* (1007121) [abrt] system-config-services-0.101.10-2.fc20:
  connection.py:651:call_blocking:DBusException:
  org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.UnknownMethod: Method "list_services" with
  signature "" on interface
  "org.fedoraproject.Config.Services.ServiceHerder" doesn't exist
  (kparal, 17:19:31)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007121   (kparal,
    17:19:31)
  * Proposed Blocker, system-config-services, NEW  (kparal, 17:19:31)
  * AGREED: 1007121 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates criterion "All
    applications that can be launched using the standard graphical
    mechanism of a release-blocking desktop after a default installation
    of that desktop must start successfully and withstand a basic
    functionality test". This needs to get fixed or removed from KDE
    spin.  (kparal, 17:25:48)

* (1026860) Instantiated service is not run, it stays in inactive state
  (and systemd debug log does not state why)  (kparal, 17:26:01)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026860   (kparal,
    17:26:02)
  * Proposed Blocker, systemd, NEW  (kparal, 17:26:02)
  * AGREED: 1026860 - Punt - We will wait until developers provided more
    information about cause and impact of this bug, so that we can
    better decide whether this should block the release.  (kparal,
    17:35:15)

* (1028207) non US keyboard layouts not working at console  (kparal,
  17:35:20)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028207   (kparal,
    17:35:20)
  * Proposed Blocker, systemd, NEW  (kparal, 17:35:20)
  * LINK: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_sign   (kparal, 17:44:54)
  * AGREED: 1028207 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates criterion "A system
    installed with a release-blocking desktop must boot to a log in
    screen where it is possible to log in to a working desktop using a
    user account created during installation or a 'first boot' utility"
    when it comes to booting from an encrypted drive with one of the
    affected keymaps.  (kparal, 17:45:08)

* (1006386) Boot takes 27 seconds longer with /var/log/journal than
  without  (kparal, 17:45:21)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006386   (kparal,
    17:45:21)
  * Proposed Blocker, systemd, NEW  (kparal, 17:45:21)
  * AGREED: 1006386 - Punt - We would like to see more information from
    systemd developers before deciding a blocker bug question. Also, we
    would like to get confirmation that this affects F20, because this
    report only mentions Rawhide and the linked (fixed) reports go to
    F19.  (kparal, 17:57:35)

* (1029594) Regression from f17 - Xorg crashes  (kparal, 17:57:41)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029594   (kparal,
    17:57:41)
  * Proposed Blocker, xorg-x11-drv-ati, NEW  (kparal, 17:57:42)
  * AGREED: 1029594 - RejectedBlocker - This doesn't seem to be a
    general issue, but affect only the reporter. If this turns out to be
    an issue affecting large portion of our user base, please
    re-propose. Also try to run clean F20 environment from LiveCD and
    report back.  (kparal, 18:02:18)
  * Proposed Freeze Exceptions  (kparal, 18:03:01)

* (972265) When using a kickstart that specifies nothing about repo,
  'closest mirror' doesn't seem to be usable  (kparal, 18:03:06)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972265   (kparal,
    18:03:06)
  * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda, NEW  (kparal, 18:03:06)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972266 is the
    other bug i found in this use case  (adamw, 18:10:45)
  * AGREED: 972265 - AcceptedFreezeException - Kickstarts are expected
    to be used as partial configuration. It should be possible to
    configure manually the remaining pieces. Unless this has changed,
    this is an inconvenient bug and we would accept a patch after freeze
    if self-contained and safe.  (kparal, 18:22:36)

* (972266) Installation Destination spoke behaves strangely when
  installing from a minimal (packages only) kickstart  (kparal,
  18:22:44)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972266   (kparal,
    18:22:44)
  * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda, NEW  (kparal, 18:22:44)
  * AGREED: 972266 - AcceptedFreezeException - This is obviously
    unintended and unexpected behaviour, and while it can be worked
    around, the workaround is quite hard to discover and to do, and
    looks really bad. We would accept a patch after freeze if
    self-contained and safe.  (kparal, 18:25:53)

* (1023609) 'biosdevname=0' not passed into installed system  (kparal,
  18:26:05)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023609   (kparal,
    18:26:05)
  * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda, POST  (kparal, 18:26:05)
  * AGREED: 1023609 - AcceptedFreezeException - This setting should be
    consistent in the installer environment and in the installed system.
    We would accept a patch after freeze if self-contained and safe.
    (kparal, 18:28:21)

* (1022810) error detecting raid1 thin pool layout  (kparal, 18:28:22)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022810   (kparal,
    18:28:23)
  * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, python-blivet, NEW  (kparal, 18:28:23)
  * AGREED: 1022810 - RejectedFreezeException - This is fine if it is
    fixed before Final freeze. But during the freeze we feel that this
    is a risky patch that might cause different side effects. If
    developers feel that this should get included during freeze and it's
    safe, please re-propose.  (kparal, 18:35:38)

* Open Floor  (kparal, 18:38:30)
  * LINK:
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Beta_Release_Criteria#Kickstart_delivery
    says "The installer must be able to use all available kickstart
    delivery methods." and "The intent of available is that the
    installer developers get to define the set of supported kickstart
    methods.", but since the anaconda devs are always telling people to
    use partial ks, it could be argued that they themselves define
    partial ks  (robatino, 18:42:49)

Meeting ended at 18:46:19 UTC.




Action Items
------------





Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* kparal (198)
* adamw (105)
* Viking-Ice (87)
* roshi (65)
* robatino (10)
* zodbot (4)
* tflink (1)
* satellit (1)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux