================================================ #fedora-blocker-review: f20beta-blocker-review-6 ================================================ Meeting started by kparal at 16:01:39 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-10-30/f20beta-blocker-review-6.2013-10-30-16.01.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (kparal, 16:01:53) * Introduction (kparal, 16:04:33) * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (kparal, 16:04:33) * We'll be following the process outlined at: (kparal, 16:04:33) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (kparal, 16:04:33) * The bugs up for review today are available at: (kparal, 16:04:34) * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (kparal, 16:04:36) * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (kparal, 16:04:38) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Alpha_Release_Criteria (kparal, 16:04:40) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Beta_Release_Criteria (kparal, 16:04:42) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Final_Release_Criteria (kparal, 16:04:44) * 2 Proposed Blockers (kparal, 16:04:55) * 15 Accepted Blockers (kparal, 16:04:55) * 0 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (kparal, 16:04:56) * 14 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (kparal, 16:04:58) * (1022810) error detecting raid1 thin pool layout (kparal, 16:06:01) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022810 (kparal, 16:06:01) * Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, NEW (kparal, 16:06:02) * AGREED: 1022810 - RejectedBlocker - The crash occurs in a very special use case when a special kind of LVM is used. It is not possible to create this LVM layout in anaconda itself, it must be pre-created in advance using other tools. We believe this is not serious enough violation to block Beta. (kparal, 16:28:31) * (1023767) shim update to 0.5 fails to boot (kparal, 16:28:40) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023767 (kparal, 16:28:40) * Proposed Blocker, shim, NEW (kparal, 16:28:40) * AGREED: 1023767 - AcceptedBlocker - This violates Beta criterion "The installer must run when launched normally from the release-blocking images." for UEFI boot for a lot of different hardware. Either fixing this or reverting to previous build is necessary. (kparal, 16:44:51) * Accepted Blockers (kparal, 16:45:22) * (1012504) FSError: filesystem already exists (kparal, 16:45:50) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012504 (kparal, 16:45:50) * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (kparal, 16:45:51) * this is verified (kparal, 16:47:07) * (1021890) Removing thin LV results in exception (kparal, 16:47:28) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021890 (kparal, 16:47:28) * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (kparal, 16:47:28) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Alpha_Release_Criteria#Installer_must_run (roshi, 16:48:26) * this is verified (kparal, 16:48:55) * (1008633) ValueError: invalid target size request (kparal, 16:49:29) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008633 (kparal, 16:49:29) * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (kparal, 16:49:29) * this needs testing, can be tested with Live by updating anaconda from koji (kparal, 16:50:41) * (1022206) ValueError: new btrfs subvols require a parent volume (kparal, 16:52:30) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022206 (kparal, 16:52:30) * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, ON_QA (kparal, 16:52:30) * this needs testing, can be tested with Beta TC6 (kparal, 16:54:02) * (1021258) requires user manually create biosboot when using guided partitioning (kparal, 16:54:35) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021258 (kparal, 16:54:35) * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (kparal, 16:54:35) * this is verified (kparal, 16:55:21) * (1021507) DeviceCreateError: ("Can't have overlapping partitions.", 'sda3') (kparal, 16:55:44) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021507 (kparal, 16:55:45) * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, NEW (kparal, 16:55:45) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021507#c22 (tflink, 16:59:00) * Beta Blocker will be moved to 1024076. there were two issues reported at once. (kparal, 17:02:39) * 1024076 seems to be fixed, but it created bug 1024144 (kparal, 17:03:52) * (1024144) SizeNotPositiveError: spec= param must be >=0 (kparal, 17:08:41) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024144 (kparal, 17:08:46) * we will leave 1024144 undecided for the moment, and cmurf will propose it for a blocker if he checks that this happens in common situations (no external manipulation with pools) (kparal, 17:19:07) * (1010495) Apple Mac EFI: you have not created a bootloader stage1 target device (kparal, 17:21:22) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010495 (kparal, 17:21:22) * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, POST (kparal, 17:21:22) * this can be tested with updates.img or with the next compose (kparal, 17:23:07) * (1016959) ValueError: Cannot remove non-leaf device 'btrfs.14' (kparal, 17:23:42) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016959 (kparal, 17:23:42) * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (kparal, 17:23:42) * AGREED: 1016959 - RejectedBlocker - After receiving more details about this bug, we consider this to be a corner case situation that should not block Beta. We will document this in CommonBugs. Please repropose for Final if you think it should block it. (kparal, 17:32:37) * (1000891) DVD is oversized (larger than 4.7 GB) (kparal, 17:32:49) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000891 (kparal, 17:32:49) * Accepted Blocker, distribution, MODIFIED (kparal, 17:32:49) * this is waiting for releng to patch pungi and use it for new compose (kparal, 17:34:48) * (1023250) home LV missing from /dev/mapper after install to BIOS RAID set (kparal, 17:35:16) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023250 (kparal, 17:35:16) * Accepted Blocker, lvm2, MODIFIED (kparal, 17:35:16) * this was tested today, found another bug, fixed again (kparal, 17:36:12) * this needs to be tested again (kparal, 17:36:55) * (1023556) Blivet.copy does not update parted disk refs for partitions on hidden disks (kparal, 17:37:25) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023556 (kparal, 17:37:25) * (1023657) repoclosure failure on 20 Beta TC6 DVDs (sugar-write) (kparal, 17:42:32) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023657 (kparal, 17:42:32) * Accepted Blocker, sugar-write, ON_QA (kparal, 17:42:32) * this should be fixed in the next compose (kparal, 17:43:28) * Open Floor (kparal, 17:43:57) * ACTION: pschindl to try TC6 boot on SecureBoot enabled machine (kparal, 17:45:37) Meeting ended at 17:49:49 UTC. Action Items ------------ * pschindl to try TC6 boot on SecureBoot enabled machine Action Items, by person ----------------------- * pschindl * pschindl to try TC6 boot on SecureBoot enabled machine * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * kparal (216) * cmurf (162) * tflink (62) * roshi (34) * dlehman (17) * pschindl (10) * zodbot (6) * penguin42 (6) * bcl (3) * nirik (3) * satellit (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
