F20 Beta Blocker Bug Review #4 Minutes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



================================================
#fedora-blocker-review: f20beta-blocker-review-4
================================================


Meeting started by kparal at 16:02:28 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-10-16/f20beta-blocker-review-4.2013-10-16-16.02.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call  (kparal, 16:02:39)
  * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
    nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
    the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have
    bugs.  (kparal, 16:06:19)
  * We'll be following the process outlined at:  (kparal, 16:06:19)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
    (kparal, 16:06:19)
  * The bugs up for review today are available at:  (kparal, 16:06:22)
  * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current   (kparal,
    16:06:23)

* Introduction  (kparal, 16:06:34)
  * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
    nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
    the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have
    bugs.  (kparal, 16:06:45)
  * We'll be following the process outlined at:  (kparal, 16:06:45)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
    (kparal, 16:06:45)
  * The bugs up for review today are available at:  (kparal, 16:06:45)
  * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current   (kparal,
    16:06:46)
  * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at:  (kparal,
    16:06:53)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Beta_Release_Criteria
    (kparal, 16:07:03)
  * Up for review today, we have:  (kparal, 16:07:15)
  * 4 Proposed Blockers  (kparal, 16:07:22)
  * 8 Accepted Blockers  (kparal, 16:07:23)
  * 5 Proposed Freeze Exceptions  (kparal, 16:07:23)
  * 3 Accepted Freeze Exceptions  (kparal, 16:07:23)

* (1017435) Anaconda uses LVM when Standard Partition is selected in
  text mode  (kparal, 16:08:09)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017435   (kparal,
    16:08:10)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED  (kparal, 16:08:10)
  * AGREED: 1013586 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 beta
    release criterion for text mode and standard partitions: "When using
    the guided partitioning flow, the installer must be able to:
    Complete an installation using any combination of disk configuration
    options it allows the user to select "  (kparal, 16:11:13)

* (1017977) FormatDestroyError: error wiping old signatures from
  /dev/vda2: 1  (kparal, 16:11:34)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017977   (kparal,
    16:11:34)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW  (kparal, 16:11:34)
  * AGREED: 1017977 - RejectedBlocker - This is rejected as a blocker
    until someone else can also reproduce the issue or the reporter can
    provide us with a clear steps that would help us reproduce the
    issue.  (kparal, 16:18:30)

* (1019541) unknown install shows up as entire disks instead of mount
  points of selected disks  (kparal, 16:18:42)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019541   (kparal,
    16:18:42)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW  (kparal, 16:18:42)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019541#c8
    (adamw, 16:25:25)
  * ACTION: kparal to test or delegate 1019541 with valid partition
    tables and previous BIOS install and no ESP booted with UEFI
    (kparal, 16:53:27)

* (1019500) device factories need to set a default name if empty name
  given for defined device  (kparal, 16:54:08)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019500   (kparal,
    16:54:08)
  * Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, ASSIGNED  (kparal, 16:54:08)
  * AGREED: 1019500 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 beta
    release criterion for RAID installs with unnamed array: "When using
    the custom partitioning flow, the installer must be able to: Reject
    or disallow invalid disk and volume configurations without
    crashing."  (kparal, 17:06:12)

* (1016801) "Don't install the latest software updates" box is unchecked
  by default, can't be checked permanently  (kparal, 17:07:12)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016801   (kparal,
    17:07:13)
  * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda, ASSIGNED  (kparal, 17:07:13)
  * AGREED: 1016801 - AcceptedFreezeException - Updates download
    checkbox might be an important feature for some people and doesn't
    present large risk. It can't be fixed post-release. A fix would be
    considered as a freeze exception.  (kparal, 17:16:38)

* (1016566) Installing a package silently fails if the GPG key for the
  yum repo is not installed  (kparal, 17:16:48)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016566   (kparal,
    17:16:48)
  * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, gnome-software, ASSIGNED  (kparal,
    17:16:48)
  * AGREED: 1016566 - AcceptedFreezeException - Installing software
    using gnome-software is an important feature and we will consider
    this fix even after freeze. If anyone finds out that update (not
    install) is not working with a missing gpg key, please propose this
    as a blocker bug.  (kparal, 17:28:18)

* (1011714) btrfs scrub finds csum corruption after btrfs balance
  (kparal, 17:28:27)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011714   (kparal,
    17:28:27)
  * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, kernel, POST  (kparal, 17:28:27)
  * AGREED: 1011714 - AcceptedFreezeException - We would like to avoid
    data corruption on btrfs. A patch is ready and seems to be safe. We
    will consider it past freeze.  (kparal, 17:36:50)

* (1017683) Invalid UID in persistent keyring name  (kparal, 17:37:36)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017683   (kparal,
    17:37:36)
  * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, kernel, MODIFIED  (kparal, 17:37:36)
  * AGREED: 1017683 - AcceptedFreezeException - This is a serious issue
    for Kerberos users. A fix would be considered past freeze.  (kparal,
    17:44:05)

* (1012141) [abrt] pulseaudio-4.0-4.gita89ca.fc20: core_free: Process
  /usr/bin/pulseaudio was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)  (kparal,
  17:45:23)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012141   (kparal,
    17:45:23)
  * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, pulseaudio, NEW  (kparal, 17:45:23)
  * AGREED: 1012141 - AcceptedFreezeException - This is a visible and
    annoying crash. An early and safe fix would be considered past
    freeze.  (kparal, 17:51:27)

* (1016959) ValueError: Cannot remove non-leaf device 'btrfs.14'
  (kparal, 17:53:39)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016959   (kparal,
    17:53:39)
  * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, NEW  (kparal, 17:53:39)
  * this is waiting for developers action  (kparal, 17:55:12)
  * We don't know whether this is going to be fixed before go/no-go,
    dlehman is busy with other bugs  (kparal, 18:02:20)

* (1010495) Apple Mac EFI: you have not created a bootloader stage1
  target device  (kparal, 18:02:46)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010495   (kparal,
    18:02:46)
  * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED  (kparal, 18:02:46)
  * the current patch is incomplete and we're waiting for bcl to refine
    the patch and submit it  (kparal, 18:04:20)

* (986575) installer fails to apply lower bound to resize requests in
  custom spoke  (kparal, 18:05:17)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986575   (kparal,
    18:05:17)
  * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED  (kparal, 18:05:17)
  * this is a fairly simple fix, but it hasn't be implemented yet.
    waiting on developers  (kparal, 18:07:42)

* (1013586) SizeNotPositiveError: spec= param must be >=0  (kparal,
  18:08:42)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013586   (kparal,
    18:08:42)
  * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, NEW  (kparal, 18:08:42)
  * this is still waiting for developer action. the fix is expected to
    be invasive and affect many parts of the installer  (kparal,
    18:12:27)
  * AGREED: 1013586 - AcceptedBlocker - We move this blocker from Beta
    to Final, because we have an explicit shrinking criterion there, as
    it was originally intended: "Any installer mechanism for resizing
    storage volumes must correctly attempt the requested operation.". If
    the fix is ready in time, please propose as Beta FE.  (kparal,
    18:31:06)

* (1000891) DVD is oversized (larger than 4.7 GB)  (kparal, 18:31:19)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000891   (kparal,
    18:31:19)
  * Accepted Blocker, distribution, MODIFIED  (kparal, 18:31:19)
  * this seems to be a pungi bug, waiting for dgilmore  (kparal,
    18:33:22)

* (1015234) F20 Beta TC1 ARM disk images unable to find root filesystem
  (kparal, 18:35:12)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015234   (kparal,
    18:35:12)
  * Accepted Blocker, dracut, ASSIGNED  (kparal, 18:35:12)
  * discussion is still ongoing as how to fix this properly. it's not
    clear whether this is fixed with the latest compose. it would be a
    good idea to ask the reporter to retest  (kparal, 18:38:59)
  * ACTION: adamw to ask Harald and Dennis about bug 1015234  (kparal,
    18:39:25)

* (1013767) rootfs on thinp not found, startup failure  (kparal,
  18:39:54)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013767   (kparal,
    18:39:55)
  * Accepted Blocker, dracut, NEW  (kparal, 18:39:55)
  * the developers are working on this, nothing to do from QA
    perspective  (kparal, 18:42:08)

* (1013800) devicetree.py:1293:handleVgLvs:DeviceTreeError: failed to
  look up thin pool  (kparal, 18:42:42)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013800   (kparal,
    18:42:42)
  * Accepted Blocker, python-blivet, ASSIGNED  (kparal, 18:42:42)
  * patch is ready for this one. dlehman needs to submit it  (kparal,
    18:44:57)

* Open Discussion <your bugs here>  (kparal, 18:46:38)

Meeting ended at 18:48:41 UTC.




Action Items
------------
* kparal to test or delegate 1019541 with valid partition tables and
  previous BIOS install and no ESP booted with UEFI
* adamw to ask Harald and Dennis about bug 1015234




Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* adamw
  * adamw to ask Harald and Dennis about bug 1015234
* kparal
  * kparal to test or delegate 1019541 with valid partition tables and
    previous BIOS install and no ESP booted with UEFI
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* kparal (290)
* adamw (205)
* tflink (121)
* dlehman (49)
* roshi (28)
* jwb (24)
* jreznik (24)
* pwhalen (10)
* Viking-Ice (10)
* mkrizek (7)
* zodbot (6)
* satellit (3)
* satellit_RPi (3)
* leigh123linux (2)
* narekb (2)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin DOT net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux