Re: redhat-lsb-core issues in rawhide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The usbmuxd problems reported by yum in your post are likely unrelated to
the lsb issue.

I have a similar usbmuxd problem in F20 Beta TC4.  After installation,
during the first "yum update" I noticed a message about a usbmuxd
scriptlet error.  This message vanished among messages from hundreds of
updates, but I see some problem with yum's installation of usbmuxd
persists.

I tried to reinstall usbmuxd, which failed, and now I am reluctant to
force the issue because it does not seem to causes any actual problem.
If there is a recommendation about how to fix this, I am willing to try.
I wonder if everyone with F20 TC4 or Rawhide has a similar situation.


[root@localhost ryniker]# yum history package usbmuxd
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks, refresh-packagekit
ID     | Action(s)      | Package                                              
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     6 | Updated        | usbmuxd-1.0.8-8.fc20.x86_64                        ##
     6 | Update         |         1.0.8-10.fc20.x86_64                       ##
     1 | Dep-Install    | usbmuxd-1.0.8-8.fc20.x86_64                          
[root@localhost ryniker]# yum reinstall usbmuxd
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks, refresh-packagekit
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
 * fedora: fedora.mirrors.tds.net
 * updates: fedora.mirrors.tds.net
 * updates-testing: fedora.mirrors.tds.net
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package usbmuxd.x86_64 0:1.0.8-10.fc20 will be an update
---> Package usbmuxd.x86_64 0:1.0.8-10.fc20 will be erased
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error:  Multilib version problems found. This often means that the root
       cause is something else and multilib version checking is just
       pointing out that there is a problem. Eg.:
       
         1. You have an upgrade for usbmuxd which is missing some
            dependency that another package requires. Yum is trying to
            solve this by installing an older version of usbmuxd of the
            different architecture. If you exclude the bad architecture
            yum will tell you what the root cause is (which package
            requires what). You can try redoing the upgrade with
            --exclude usbmuxd.otherarch ... this should give you an error
            message showing the root cause of the problem.
       
         2. You have multiple architectures of usbmuxd installed, but
            yum can only see an upgrade for one of those architectures.
            If you don't want/need both architectures anymore then you
            can remove the one with the missing update and everything
            will work.
       
         3. You have duplicate versions of usbmuxd installed already.
            You can use "yum check" to get yum show these errors.
       
       ...you can also use --setopt=protected_multilib=false to remove
       this checking, however this is almost never the correct thing to
       do as something else is very likely to go wrong (often causing
       much more problems).
       
       Protected multilib versions: usbmuxd-1.0.8-10.fc20.x86_64 != usbmuxd-1.0.8-8.fc20.x86_64
[root@localhost ryniker]# yum check
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks, refresh-packagekit
usbmuxd-1.0.8-10.fc20.x86_64 is a duplicate with usbmuxd-1.0.8-8.fc20.x86_64
Error: check all
[root@localhost ryniker]# 

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux