On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 12:41 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 10/16/2013 02:14 AM, Andre Robatino wrote: > > dlehman proposedhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019500 as a > > Beta Blocker, andhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019502 as a > > Final Blocker, but both are private, so they need to be fixed before the > > meeting. > > Great yet another broken RH workflow clones of internal RHEL bugs I > presume.... Basically, yeah, people cloned bugs and forgot it'd clone the 'private' property. I don't really see what's 'broken', though - this is a case where it's actually appropriate to use a clone, because there's a whole report already done as a result of RHEL testing, and we want to have that same bug reported for Fedora. They just ought to remember to clear the private flag and make any other appropriate changes. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin DOT net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test