F20 Beta Blocker Bug Review #3 Minutes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



================================================
#fedora-blocker-review: f20beta-blocker-review-3
================================================


Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-10-09/f20beta-blocker-review-3.2013-10-09-16.01.html
Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-10-09/f20beta-blocker-review-3.2013-10-09-16.01.txt
Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-10-09/f20beta-blocker-review-3.2013-10-09-16.01.log.html



Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call  (tflink, 16:01:25)

* Introduction  (tflink, 16:05:45)
  * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
    nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
    the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and freeze
    exception bugs.  (tflink, 16:05:54)
  * We'll be following the process outlined at:  (tflink, 16:06:00)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
    (tflink, 16:06:00)
  * The bugs up for review today are available at:  (tflink, 16:06:05)
  * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current   (tflink,
    16:06:05)
  * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at:  (tflink,
    16:06:12)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Beta_Release_Criteria
    (tflink, 16:06:12)
  * Up for review today, we have:  (tflink, 16:06:17)
  * 6 Proposed Blockers  (tflink, 16:06:26)
  * 12 Accepted Blockers  (tflink, 16:06:26)
  * 2 Proposed Freeze Exceptions  (tflink, 16:06:26)
  * 5 Accepted Freeze Exceptions  (tflink, 16:06:26)

* (1009809) KeyError: 'name'  (tflink, 16:07:58)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009809   (tflink,
    16:07:58)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ON_QA  (tflink, 16:07:59)
  * AGREED: 1009809 - RejectedBlocker - As stated in the F20 beta
    criteria, only one of [nfs, nfsiso] is required to work for beta. As
    nfs package sources have been confirmed to work, this is rejected as
    a release blocking bug for f20 beta.  (tflink, 16:11:08)

* (1013586) SizeNotPositiveError: spec= param must be >=0  (tflink,
  16:11:16)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013586   (tflink,
    16:11:16)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW  (tflink, 16:11:16)
  * AGREED: 1013586 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 beta
    release criterion for partitions not created using parted: "When
    using the guided partitioning flow, the installer must be able to
    ... Complete an installation using any combination of disk
    configuration options it allows the user to select"  (tflink,
    16:18:06)

* (1015220) can't log in as ordinary user after text install unless
  under user spoke, password field is last one filled out  (tflink,
  16:18:29)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015220   (tflink,
    16:18:32)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, VERIFIED  (tflink, 16:18:34)
  * AGREED: 1015220 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha
    release criterion for text installs where the user password isn't
    the last spoke entered: "A system installed without a graphical
    package set must boot to a state where it is possible to log in
    through at least one of the default virtual consoles."  (tflink,
    16:23:23)

* (1016927) Fedora 20 Beta TC2 Anaconda Netinstall gets error checking
  software configuration  (tflink, 16:23:36)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016927   (tflink,
    16:23:39)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW  (tflink, 16:23:42)
  * AGREED: 1016927 - This would be a blocker if the broken packages
    were actually on any images but it was fixed quickly enough such
    that it was never included. Thus, it is rejected as a release
    blocking bug for f20 beta.  (tflink, 16:34:11)

* (1016959) ValueError: Cannot remove non-leaf device 'btrfs.14'
  (tflink, 16:34:24)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016959   (tflink,
    16:34:27)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW  (tflink, 16:34:30)
  * AGREED: 1016959 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 beta
    release criterion, assuming that the disk layout in question is not
    considered valid: "When using the custom partitioning flow, the
    installer must be able to ... Reject or disallow invalid disk and
    volume configurations without crashing."  (tflink, 17:00:13)

* (1015234) F20 Beta TC1 ARM disk images unable to find root filesystem
  (tflink, 17:01:31)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015234   (tflink,
    17:01:34)
  * Proposed Blocker, dracut, NEW  (tflink, 17:01:36)
  * AGREED: 1015234 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha
    release criterion for ARM images in virt and on bare-metal: "A
    system installed with a release-blocking desktop must boot to a log
    in screen where it is possible to log in to a working desktop using
    a user account created during installation or a 'first boot'
    utility."  (tflink, 17:09:19)

* (1011714) btrfs scrub finds csum corruption after btrfs balance
  (tflink, 17:12:41)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011714   (tflink,
    17:12:45)
  * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, kernel, MODIFIED  (tflink, 17:12:47)
  * AGREED: 1011714 - We'd like to see more information on how
    big/invasive/risky this patch is before making a decision on FE,
    will ask relevant devs and revisit at the next review meeting
    (tflink, 17:31:46)

* (1015731) netinstall f20 Beta TC-1  x86_64 of sugar-desktop boots to
  console login  (tflink, 17:32:04)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015731   (tflink,
    17:32:07)
  * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, sugar, NEW  (tflink, 17:32:09)
  * AGREED: 1015731 - AcceptedFreezeException - This prevents
    sugar-desktop from booting or functioning properly after install. As
    a secondary DE, a tested fix would be considered after freeze.
    (tflink, 17:37:05)

* (901917) rescue a fedora system mode doesn't recognize luks
  installation  (tflink, 17:40:19)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901917   (tflink,
    17:40:22)
  * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED  (tflink, 17:40:25)
  * this has been verified, pushed stable and closed  (tflink, 17:40:32)

* (986575) installer fails to apply lower bound to resize requests in
  custom spoke  (tflink, 17:41:14)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986575   (tflink,
    17:41:17)
  * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED  (tflink, 17:41:19)
  * no apparant movement on this bug yet  (tflink, 17:42:23)
  * devs are aware of the issue, proposed it as a blocker  (tflink,
    17:42:33)

* (1010495) Apple Mac EFI: you have not created a bootloader stage1
  target device  (tflink, 17:48:17)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010495   (tflink,
    17:48:20)
  * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED  (tflink, 17:48:23)
  * work on this has been moving along, doesn't appear as if anything is
    needed from us at this time  (tflink, 17:48:40)
  * there is an updates.img, it has not been rolled into anaconda as of
    20.23-1  (tflink, 17:49:31)

* (1012504) FSError: filesystem already exists  (tflink, 17:49:51)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012504   (tflink,
    17:49:52)
  * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED  (tflink, 17:49:52)
  * this is no longer an issue and it can now be closed  (tflink,
    17:51:18)

* (1000891) DVD is oversized (larger than 4.7 GB)  (tflink, 17:52:05)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000891   (tflink,
    17:52:05)
  * Accepted Blocker, distribution, MODIFIED  (tflink, 17:52:05)
  * F20 beta TC2 is still oversize  (tflink, 17:52:19)
  * a different fix is needed than the KS exclusion, looking for a
    different method to exclude the gimp-help files  (tflink, 17:53:07)
  * devs are aware of the issue, looking for a fix  (tflink, 17:53:55)

* (1013767) rootfs on thinp not found, startup failure  (tflink,
  17:54:49)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013767   (tflink,
    17:54:49)
  * Accepted Blocker, dracut, NEW  (tflink, 17:54:49)
  * work is progressing on this bug, nothing is needed from us at this
    point  (tflink, 17:55:32)

* (1009132) updates-plugin-WARNING **: failed to download: The backend
  exited unexpectedly.  (tflink, 17:57:45)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009132   (tflink,
    17:57:48)
  * Accepted Blocker, gnome-settings-daemon, ASSIGNED  (tflink,
    17:57:51)
  * ACTION: pschindl to re-test #1009132 to make sure it's still an
    issue  (tflink, 17:58:42)
  * there appears to have been no movement on this for weeks, we're not
    even sure it's still an issue  (tflink, 17:59:50)
  * ACTION: pschindl to sync up with hughsie about this issue after
    re-testing  (tflink, 18:00:21)

* (1000893) Desktop Live is oversized (larger than 1 GB)  (tflink,
  18:01:02)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000893   (tflink,
    18:01:02)
  * Accepted Blocker, LiveCD, NEW  (tflink, 18:01:03)
  * LINK:
    http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/20-Beta-TC2/Live/x86_64/
    (dan408-, 18:02:23)
  * ACTION: dan408 to follow up with the gnome folks on getting the
    desktop spin under size  (tflink, 18:43:33)

* (1016842) devicetree.py:1293:handleVgLvs:DeviceTreeError: failed to
  look up thin pool  (tflink, 18:47:49)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016842   (tflink,
    18:47:52)
  * Accepted Blocker, python-blivet, ASSIGNED  (tflink, 18:47:55)
  * this is not actually a blocker, clone artifact  (tflink, 18:49:31)

* (1013800) devicetree.py:1293:handleVgLvs:DeviceTreeError: failed to
  look up thin pool  (tflink, 18:56:52)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013800   (tflink,
    18:56:55)
  * Accepted Blocker, python-blivet, ASSIGNED  (tflink, 18:56:57)
  * there is a fix available per c#7 but another issue was found during
    development  (tflink, 18:57:40)
  * currently waiting on a fix for this new issue  (tflink, 18:58:11)
  * there was supposed to be more conversation with lvm folks by this
    past monday, no update since then - ask for more information in bug
    (tflink, 18:59:09)

* Open Floor  (tflink, 18:59:42)
  * next blocker review meeting will be on 2013-10-16 @ 16:00 UTC
    (tflink, 19:00:57)
  * if needed, another meeting will be scheduled for 2013-10-14
    (tflink, 19:01:23)

Meeting ended at 19:01:38 UTC.




Action Items
------------
* pschindl to re-test #1009132 to make sure it's still an issue
* pschindl to sync up with hughsie about this issue after re-testing
* dan408 to follow up with the gnome folks on getting the desktop spin
  under size




Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* pschindl
  * pschindl to re-test #1009132 to make sure it's still an issue
  * pschindl to sync up with hughsie about this issue after re-testing
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * dan408 to follow up with the gnome folks on getting the desktop spin
    under size




People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* tflink (285)
* cmurf (119)
* Viking-Ice (100)
* roshi (36)
* kparal (36)
* jreznik (21)
* satellit (18)
* pschindl (16)
* pwhalen (12)
* dan408- (7)
* zodbot (6)
* mkrizek (4)
* jreznik2 (4)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux