Kevin Fenzi <kevin <at> scrye.com> writes: > On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 20:15:01 +0000 (UTC) > Andre Robatino <robatino <at> fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > In principle it would be nice if both TCs and RCs were named > > uniquely, but I realize it would be even more of a hassle to rename > > the RC and recreate/edit the checksum file when one is picked as Gold. > > It would defeat the entire point of having a RC. > > A TC can NEVER be the final released bits. > > A RC could be, and if it is, it's just released. Changing it at all > after it's been tested means you aren't actually testing the thing you > are releasing. You are testing something else and hoping you don't mess > up something in changing it. There's no need to change the RC. For example, compose the RC exactly as it's done now, then change the ISO names to be unique. After testing, change the Gold RC's name back and recreate/edit the CHECKSUM files (for good measure make sure the checksums are the same before and after). During testing, the name is unique, and the released ISO is identical to the tested one. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
