================================================ #fedora-blocker-review: f20beta-blocker-review-2 ================================================ Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-10-02/f20beta-blocker-review-2.2013-10-02-16.00.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-10-02/f20beta-blocker-review-2.2013-10-02-16.00.txt Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-10-02/f20beta-blocker-review-2.2013-10-02-16.00.log.html Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (tflink, 16:00:25) * Introduction (tflink, 16:04:09) * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and freeze exception bugs. (tflink, 16:04:14) * We'll be following the process outlined at: (tflink, 16:04:19) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (tflink, 16:04:19) * The bugs up for review today are available at: (tflink, 16:04:29) * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (tflink, 16:04:29) * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (tflink, 16:04:35) * Up for review today, we have: (tflink, 16:05:06) * 9 Proposed Blockers (tflink, 16:05:34) * 7 Accepted Blockers (tflink, 16:05:34) * 1 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (tflink, 16:05:34) * 4 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (tflink, 16:05:35) * (1009809) KeyError: 'name' (tflink, 16:06:44) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009809 (tflink, 16:06:44) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ON_QA (tflink, 16:06:44) * AGREED: 1009809 - This still needs testing to see if at least 1 of nfs/nfsiso works - will revisit once that testing has been done (tflink, 16:10:10) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012504 (tflink, 16:10:16) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (tflink, 16:10:16) * AGREED: 1012504 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 beta release criterion for btrfs custom partitions: "When using the custom partitioning flow, the installer must be able to ... Create mount points backed by ext4 partitions, LVM volumes or btrfs volumes ..." (tflink, 16:17:54) * (1010495) Apple Mac EFI: you have not created a bootloader stage1 target device (tflink, 16:18:07) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010495 (tflink, 16:18:10) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, POST (tflink, 16:18:13) * AGREED: 1010495 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 beta release criterion for EFI system partitions on apple hardware: "Cleanly install to a disk with a valid ms-dos or gpt disk label and partition table which contains existing data and sufficient unpartitioned space for a Fedora installation" (tflink, 16:25:03) * (1013800) devicetree.py:1293:handleVgLvs:DeviceTreeError: failed to look up thin pool (tflink, 16:25:15) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013800 (tflink, 16:25:18) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:25:21) * AGREED: 1013800 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 beta release criterion for LVM thinp: "When using the guided partitioning flow, the installer must be able to ... Complete an installation using any combination of disk configuration options it allows the user to select" (tflink, 16:28:14) * (1013586) SizeNotPositiveError: spec= param must be >=0 (tflink, 16:28:39) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013586 (tflink, 16:28:39) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:28:39) * AGREED: 1013586 - We need more information and testing to figure out how common this failure mode is. will re-visit once more testing has been done. (tflink, 16:35:03) * (1012646) anaconda creates grub.cfg lacking an initrd entry, kernel panics on reboot (tflink, 16:35:42) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012646 (tflink, 16:35:45) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (tflink, 16:35:47) * AGREED: 1012646 - RejectedBlocker - This is a problem but the actual bug is in grubby, not anaconda and in this case, anaconda is behaving as expected (tflink, 16:40:26) * (1013087) selection of rescue kernel causes kernel panic, due to lack of initramfs (tflink, 16:40:43) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013087 (tflink, 16:40:46) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:40:48) * AGREED: 1013087 - RejectedBlocker - While unfortunate, this does not violate any F20 beta release criteria and thus is rejected as a release blocking issue for f20 beta (tflink, 16:53:10) * (1013767) rootfs on thinp not found, startup failure (tflink, 16:53:35) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013767 (tflink, 16:53:35) * Proposed Blocker, dracut, NEW (tflink, 16:53:35) * AGREED: 1013767 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha release criterion for LVM thinp autopart installs: "A system installed with a release-blocking desktop must boot to a log in screen where it is possible to log in to a working desktop using a user account created during installation or a 'first boot' utility." (tflink, 17:06:49) * (864198) grubby fatal error updating grub.cfg when /boot is btrfs (tflink, 17:06:59) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864198 (tflink, 17:07:02) * Proposed Blocker, grubby, ASSIGNED (tflink, 17:07:05) * AGREED: 864198 - RejectedBlocker - This does not clearly violate any F20 beta criteria and is a corner case. Therefore, it does not qualify as a release blocking bug for f20 beta. (tflink, 17:39:25) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980221 (adamw, 17:41:14) * (1007590) Black screen after F20 graphical install on PPC64 (tflink, 17:44:05) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007590 (tflink, 17:44:08) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, glibc, ASSIGNED (tflink, 17:44:10) * AGREED: 1007590 - AcceptedFreezeException - This is a showstopper for PPC64 and while not PA, a tested fix would be considered past freeze. (tflink, 17:47:29) * (1000891) DVD is oversized (larger than 4.7 GB) (tflink, 17:53:34) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000891 (tflink, 17:53:34) * Accepted Blocker, distribution, NEW (tflink, 17:53:35) * ACTION: jreznik to start investigating ways to trim down the dvd size or find someone to do it (tflink, 17:59:38) * DVD still oversize, needs discussion/changes to get it back under 4.7 GB (tflink, 18:00:04) * Open Floor (tflink, 18:04:01) * next blocker review meeting will be 2013-10-09 @ 16:00 UTC (tflink, 18:06:00) Meeting ended at 18:07:58 UTC. Action Items ------------ * jreznik to start investigating ways to trim down the dvd size or find someone to do it Action Items, by person ----------------------- * jreznik * jreznik to start investigating ways to trim down the dvd size or find someone to do it * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * tflink (240) * cmurf (181) * adamw (179) * Viking-Ice (110) * kparal (56) * roshi (37) * dan408 (37) * zodbot (11) * jreznik (10) * handsome_pirate (9) * mkrizek (1) * pwhalen (1) * pschindl (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
