================================================= #fedora-blocker-review: f20alpha-blocker-review-2 ================================================= Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-08-28/f20alpha-blocker-review-2.2013-08-28-16.01.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-08-28/f20alpha-blocker-review-2.2013-08-28-16.01.txt Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-08-28/f20alpha-blocker-review-2.2013-08-28-16.01.log.html Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (tflink, 16:01:42) * Introduction (tflink, 16:05:28) * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and freeze exception bugs. (tflink, 16:05:50) * We'll be following the process outlined at: (tflink, 16:05:58) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (tflink, 16:05:58) * The bugs up for review today are available at: (tflink, 16:06:05) * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (tflink, 16:06:05) * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (tflink, 16:06:11) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Alpha_Release_Criteria (tflink, 16:06:11) * Up for review today, we have: (tflink, 16:06:16) * 7 Proposed Blockers (tflink, 16:06:23) * 4 Accepted Blockers (tflink, 16:06:23) * 0 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (tflink, 16:06:23) * 2 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (tflink, 16:06:23) * (1000889) AttributeError: 'DeviceFormat' object has no attribute 'mount' (tflink, 16:07:15) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000889 (tflink, 16:07:18) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:07:21) * AGREED: 1000889 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha release criterion: "The installer must be able to complete an installation to a single disk using automatic partitioning." (tflink, 16:09:27) * (1000927) 20 Alpha TC1 i386 install image (netinst or DVD) freezes in the first step (tflink, 16:09:35) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000927 (tflink, 16:09:38) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:09:40) * AGREED: 1000927 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha release criterion for 32bit installs: "When using the dedicated installer images, the installer must be able to complete an installation using the text, graphical and VNC installation interfaces." (tflink, 16:11:41) * (994180) Boot-time LUKS passphrase input *always* defaults to en-us (tflink, 16:11:49) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994180 (tflink, 16:11:52) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:11:54) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875567#c20 (kparal, 16:20:13) * ACTION: kparal to make sure 994180 is investigated (kparal, 16:29:23) * AGREED: 994180 - This doesn't seem like an alpha blocker with the existing workarounds but we want to make sure those workarounds actually _work_ before rejecting. Will revisit at the next blocker review meeting (tflink, 16:31:25) * (1000715) TypeError: Argument 2 does not allow None as a value (tflink, 16:31:41) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000715 (tflink, 16:31:44) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:31:47) * AGREED: 1000715 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha release criteria for installs using a non-en-us keyboard: "The installer must run when launched normally from the release-blocking images." (tflink, 17:08:20) * there was some discussion around whether we should have locale criterion or not but more investigation would be needed before any propoal went forward (tflink, 17:11:03) * (1002055) [abrt] gnome-shell-3.9.90-1.fc20: g_variant_valist_new_nnp: Process /usr/bin/gnome-shell was killed by signal 5 (SIGTRAP) (tflink, 17:11:15) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002055 (tflink, 17:11:18) * Proposed Blocker, gnome-shell, NEW (tflink, 17:11:20) * AGREED: 1002055 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha release criterion for the 32bit desktop spin: "Release-blocking live images must boot to the expected boot menu, and then to a desktop or to a login prompt where it is clear how to log in to a desktop." (tflink, 17:13:57) * (1001081) anaconda unable to select INSTALLATION SOURCE (Exception yum.Errors.RepoError...) (tflink, 17:14:02) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001081 (tflink, 17:14:05) * Proposed Blocker, pykickstart, MODIFIED (tflink, 17:14:08) * AGREED: 1001081 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha release criterion: "When using the DVD image, the installer must be able to use the DVD as a package source." (tflink, 17:15:20) * (679486) Liveinst doesn't start if hostname changes (tflink, 17:15:30) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679486 (tflink, 17:15:30) * Proposed Blocker, xorg-x11-xauth, ASSIGNED (tflink, 17:15:30) * AGREED: 679486 - RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException - This is a reoccurance of a bug that was accepted as final blocker for F19 but the fix didn't make it into F20. It doesn't violate any F20 alpha release criteria but a tested fix would be considered after freeze. (tflink, 17:20:45) * (995268) TypeError: Argument 2 does not allow None as a value - If no hostname is set by DHCP (tflink, 17:23:47) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995268 (tflink, 17:23:50) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (tflink, 17:23:52) * AGREED: 995268 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha release criteria for non-en-us locales or improperly detected locales: "Release-blocking dedicated installer images must boot to the expected boot menu, and then after a reasonable timeout to the installer." (tflink, 17:35:04) * (997690) SizeNotPositiveError: bytes= param must be >=0 (tflink, 17:36:57) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997690 (tflink, 17:36:58) * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, POST (tflink, 17:36:58) * patch submitted, waiting for merge and new anaconda build (tflink, 17:39:03) * (983319) Install gets stuck returning from Installation Destination spoke (tflink, 17:41:41) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983319 (tflink, 17:41:44) * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (tflink, 17:41:46) * this has been fixed in anaconda-20.8-1 (F20 Alpha TC1) and can be closed (tflink, 17:43:28) * (985342) illegal instructions with glibc-2.17.90 on armv7hl (tflink, 17:45:20) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985342 (tflink, 17:45:23) * Accepted Blocker, glibc, MODIFIED (tflink, 17:45:26) * there is a new build that should fix this issue on the affected armv7hl platforms (tflink, 17:48:19) * glibc-2.18-5.fc20 will be in TC2 or TC3, will need testing to verify (tflink, 17:49:37) * Open Floor (tflink, 17:50:38) * Alpha Change Deadline is 2013-09-03 (tflink, 17:52:24) * the next blocker review meeting will be 2013-09-04 @ 16:00 UTC in #fedora-blocker-review (tflink, 17:53:58) Meeting ended at 17:56:13 UTC. Action Items ------------ * kparal to make sure 994180 is investigated Action Items, by person ----------------------- * kparal * kparal to make sure 994180 is investigated * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * tflink (234) * spstarr_work (126) * kparal (99) * handsome_pirate (64) * Viking-Ice (41) * pschindl (26) * pwhalen (13) * mkrizek (10) * ignatenkobrain (9) * zodbot (9) * jreznik (8) * seasc (7) * dgilmore (6) * dcantrell (4) * roshi (2) * nirik (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
