2013-08-21 @ 16:00 UTC - F20 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #1 Minutes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



=================================================
#fedora-blocker-review: f20alpha-blocker-review-1
=================================================

Minutes:  http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-08-21/f20alpha-blocker-review-1.2013-08-21-16.01.html
Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-08-21/f20alpha-blocker-review-1.2013-08-21-16.01.txt
Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-08-21/f20alpha-blocker-review-1.2013-08-21-16.01.log.html


Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call  (tflink, 16:01:31)

* Introduction  (tflink, 16:06:59)
  * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
    nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
    the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and freeze
    exception bugs.  (tflink, 16:07:06)
  * We'll be following the process outlined at:  (tflink, 16:07:11)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
    (tflink, 16:07:11)
  * The bugs up for review today are available at:  (tflink, 16:07:17)
  * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current   (tflink,
    16:07:17)
  * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at:  (tflink,
    16:07:25)
  * LINK:
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Alpha_Release_Criteria
    (tflink, 16:07:25)
  * Up for review today, we have:  (tflink, 16:07:30)
  * 5 Proposed Blockers  (tflink, 16:07:58)
  * 0 Accepted Blockers  (tflink, 16:07:58)
  * 0 Proposed Freeze Exceptions  (tflink, 16:07:58)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW  (tflink, 16:08:39)

* (901917) rescue a fedora system mode doesn't recognize luks
  installation  (tflink, 16:08:43)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901917   (tflink,
    16:08:46)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW  (tflink, 16:08:49)
  * AGREED: 901917 - RejectedBlocker (alpha) AcceptedFreezeException
    (alpha) AcceptedBlocker (beta) - Violates the following F20 beta
    release criterion: "The rescue mode of the installer must be able to
    detect and mount any installation performed according to the
    applicable criteria, and provide a shell with access to utilities
    capable of performing typical recovery operations."  (tflink,
    16:12:02)

* (997690) SizeNotPositiveError: bytes= param must be >=0  (tflink,
  16:12:10)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997690   (tflink,
    16:12:10)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, POST  (tflink, 16:12:10)
  * AGREED: 997690 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha
    release criterion: "The installer must be able to complete an
    installation to a single disk using automatic partitioning."
    (tflink, 16:19:08)

* (985342) illegal instructions with glibc-2.17.90 on armv7hl  (tflink,
  16:19:18)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985342   (tflink,
    16:19:21)
  * Proposed Blocker, glibc, ASSIGNED  (tflink, 16:19:23)
  * AGREED: 985342 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha
    release criterion for trimslice (and potentially others): "A system
    installed with a release-blocking desktop must boot to a log in
    screen where it is possible to log in to a working desktop using a
    user account created during installation or a 'first boot' utility."
    (tflink, 16:30:43)

* (979174) initial-setup-text.service does not run on console  (tflink,
  16:30:53)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979174   (tflink,
    16:30:56)
  * Proposed Blocker, initial-setup, NEW  (tflink, 16:30:59)
  * AGREED: 979174 - RejectedBlocker (alpha) AcceptedFreezeException
    (alpha) AcceptedBlocker (beta) - Violates the following F20 beta
    release criterion for many headless minimal arm installs: "The
    installer must be able to complete an installation using the serial
    console interface."  (tflink, 16:53:46)

* (997149) task systemd-udevd:757 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  (tflink, 16:54:02)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997149   (tflink,
    16:54:05)
  * Proposed Blocker, kernel, MODIFIED  (tflink, 16:54:07)
  * the blocker proposal was transferred to 997149 when 983319 was
    closed as a dupe - that bug has been re-opened and the proposal for
    release blocking status moved back  (tflink, 17:00:58)

* (983319) Install gets stuck returning from Installation Destination
  spoke  (tflink, 17:02:11)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983319   (tflink,
    17:02:13)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED  (tflink, 17:02:16)
  * AGREED: 983319 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha
    release criterion: "The installer must be able to complete an
    installation using any supported locally connected storage
    interface."  (tflink, 17:07:23)

* Open Floor  (tflink, 17:08:15)

Meeting ended at 17:16:52 UTC.




Action Items
------------





Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* tflink (140)
* adamw (98)
* pwhalen (28)
* kparal (24)
* Viking-Ice (19)
* dgilmore (18)
* pschindl (10)
* zodbot (6)
* mkrizek (6)
* jreznik (3)
* nonamedotc (2)
* nirik (1)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux