================================================= #fedora-blocker-review: f20alpha-blocker-review-1 ================================================= Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-08-21/f20alpha-blocker-review-1.2013-08-21-16.01.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-08-21/f20alpha-blocker-review-1.2013-08-21-16.01.txt Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-08-21/f20alpha-blocker-review-1.2013-08-21-16.01.log.html Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (tflink, 16:01:31) * Introduction (tflink, 16:06:59) * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and freeze exception bugs. (tflink, 16:07:06) * We'll be following the process outlined at: (tflink, 16:07:11) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (tflink, 16:07:11) * The bugs up for review today are available at: (tflink, 16:07:17) * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (tflink, 16:07:17) * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (tflink, 16:07:25) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Alpha_Release_Criteria (tflink, 16:07:25) * Up for review today, we have: (tflink, 16:07:30) * 5 Proposed Blockers (tflink, 16:07:58) * 0 Accepted Blockers (tflink, 16:07:58) * 0 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (tflink, 16:07:58) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:08:39) * (901917) rescue a fedora system mode doesn't recognize luks installation (tflink, 16:08:43) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901917 (tflink, 16:08:46) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:08:49) * AGREED: 901917 - RejectedBlocker (alpha) AcceptedFreezeException (alpha) AcceptedBlocker (beta) - Violates the following F20 beta release criterion: "The rescue mode of the installer must be able to detect and mount any installation performed according to the applicable criteria, and provide a shell with access to utilities capable of performing typical recovery operations." (tflink, 16:12:02) * (997690) SizeNotPositiveError: bytes= param must be >=0 (tflink, 16:12:10) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997690 (tflink, 16:12:10) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, POST (tflink, 16:12:10) * AGREED: 997690 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha release criterion: "The installer must be able to complete an installation to a single disk using automatic partitioning." (tflink, 16:19:08) * (985342) illegal instructions with glibc-2.17.90 on armv7hl (tflink, 16:19:18) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985342 (tflink, 16:19:21) * Proposed Blocker, glibc, ASSIGNED (tflink, 16:19:23) * AGREED: 985342 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha release criterion for trimslice (and potentially others): "A system installed with a release-blocking desktop must boot to a log in screen where it is possible to log in to a working desktop using a user account created during installation or a 'first boot' utility." (tflink, 16:30:43) * (979174) initial-setup-text.service does not run on console (tflink, 16:30:53) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979174 (tflink, 16:30:56) * Proposed Blocker, initial-setup, NEW (tflink, 16:30:59) * AGREED: 979174 - RejectedBlocker (alpha) AcceptedFreezeException (alpha) AcceptedBlocker (beta) - Violates the following F20 beta release criterion for many headless minimal arm installs: "The installer must be able to complete an installation using the serial console interface." (tflink, 16:53:46) * (997149) task systemd-udevd:757 blocked for more than 120 seconds. (tflink, 16:54:02) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997149 (tflink, 16:54:05) * Proposed Blocker, kernel, MODIFIED (tflink, 16:54:07) * the blocker proposal was transferred to 997149 when 983319 was closed as a dupe - that bug has been re-opened and the proposal for release blocking status moved back (tflink, 17:00:58) * (983319) Install gets stuck returning from Installation Destination spoke (tflink, 17:02:11) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983319 (tflink, 17:02:13) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (tflink, 17:02:16) * AGREED: 983319 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha release criterion: "The installer must be able to complete an installation using any supported locally connected storage interface." (tflink, 17:07:23) * Open Floor (tflink, 17:08:15) Meeting ended at 17:16:52 UTC. Action Items ------------ Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * tflink (140) * adamw (98) * pwhalen (28) * kparal (24) * Viking-Ice (19) * dgilmore (18) * pschindl (10) * zodbot (6) * mkrizek (6) * jreznik (3) * nonamedotc (2) * nirik (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
