Re: Bug report with private info

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne úterý, 20. srpna 2013 15:57:03 CEST, Kamil Paral  napsal(a):

just a question ... are you aware that you can use those little arrows next
to search field to go through (highlighted) strings that abrt has
identified as potentially sensitive?

No, that is totally undiscoverable! Reported:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998999

thanks for taking the time to report this; btw, I believe I've seen a User eXperience tracker bug somewhere, this one should block it

- see attachment 685135 to bug 896246

A hyperlink is better:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachmentcgi?id=685135
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896246#c5

you're right, sorry

btw, while at it, I'd be glad if someone else voices opinion on that bug
(am I completely off?)

Thanks for sharing. I'm annoyed as well by having libsecret and similar package names often highlighted.

please mention your "libsecret" case on that bug, so we can see how useful would such a package/file name filter be

K.

--
Karel Volný
QE BaseOs/Daemons Team
Red Hat Czech, Brno
tel. +420 532294274
(RH: +420 532294111 ext. 8262074)
xmpp kavol@xxxxxxxxx
:: "Never attribute to malice what can
::  easily be explained by stupidity."
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux