On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 22:55 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 07/23/2013 09:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > * Changes/AppInstaller[2] may result in us using two > > depsolvers in official packaging tools > > Wont this affect our criteria No broken package/Use for severe issues in > applying updates/Updates etc? It depends on exactly how the feature plays out, but I think it should be okay. The 'no broken package' stuff relates to the distribution installer - it's about making sure you don't hit dependency issues during installation. So for that criterion / test we only care about the depsolver used by the installer. The 'update' criteria basically cover each release blocking desktop's default update system, and yum - so we only care about the depsolvers used there. AIUI, all the bits mentioned above should still be using the same old depsolver in F20: AppInstaller will not be handling updates. But we'll have to see how it pans out (and if FESCo even approves it - they may well reject it because of this depsolver issue, or require the depsolver issue to be resolved for the Change to be accepted). -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
