On Jul 14, 2013 6:21 PM, "Ankur Sinha" <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 11:59 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Getting back on topic, I propose the wiki page be modified to say that > > karma only depends on whether the package update works or not, > > irrespective of the update description. A 0 karma comment can be > > dropped, but not a -1. > > Another instance: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-11668/dvd > +rw-tools-7.1-13.fc19 > > The update has got -3 karma for descriptions. This will *never* reach > users and fix their bugs in this state!
Huh? The maintainer fixed the description and I just gave it the last +1 it needed to autopush stable. This worked exactly like it was supposed to.
> Adam, I think this has gone too far now :( > > A clear set of guidelines/policy on update descriptions and whether > karma depends on them needs to be put in place before a war breaks out.
So far the only standard being enforced is that the contents of the update description not be "Here is where you give a description of your update." That's not really that unreasonable.
-T.C.
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
