On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 13:47 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 16:28 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 13:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > As things stand, we don't really have a fallback graphics method for > > > UEFI. > > > > False. > > In what way? That was the impression I was getting from the discussions > in the bugs. If we have one, what is it? How should it be triggered? In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977816#c7 you say: > fortuitously, though, since the modern X drivers for the major cards - > nouveau, radeon, intel - all require KMS, simply passing 'nomodeset' > has the effect we want: you wind up getting vesa as the fallback > driver, because the main driver refuses to load without KMS. That _is_ the fallback. And, as I said in the other fork of this thread, you ought to get the fbdev driver in this scenario. If that doesn't _work_, then that's merely a bug. But it ought to. - ajax -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
