Re: Negative karma for missing update descriptions?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>Well, I hate writing descriptions for new package.

>But this "catanzaro" still gave me -1 to the update.

>You can email me with the issue and I can edit, but -1 is not good.

Completely agree

>Sure it should, the update is defective. The description isn't optional

it should, only when the bug fixed are not described, i think providing the bug # is sufficient and in this case (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-12227/youtube-dl-2013.07.02-1.fc19?_csrf_token=250e02ff8797fd26dd3eae7265854ece8c1b1e27) providing -ve karma is so inappropriate

--

Akshay vyas
(http://www.gofedora.in)
 
-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux