Adam Williamson (awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > Note that the situation with sssd is a bit complex. The broken update > was submitted for updates-testing on 06-12 at 12:01, and pushed to > updates-testing on 06-12 at 12:41. It was then marked to be 'unpushed' - > i.e. taken off the mirrors - on 06-13 at 01:28. A fixed sssd package was > then added to the update and submitted for updates-testing on 06-13 at > 10:56, and pushed to updates-testing on 06-13 at 15:53. > > I'm not sure whether unpushes require any manual action or if they > happen automatically, but if the unpush actually happened, then there > was a time when the 'most current' state of the mirrors would have an > *older* sssd package than a 'less current' state of the mirrors - a > 'less current' mirror would still have the broken update, but a 'more > current' mirror would have had it removed. It's not _always_ the case > that the mirror with a higher-versioned package is the more up to date. > 99% of the time, but not always. Unless something has changed in the bodhi infrastructure, 'unpush' just means 'untagged from updates-testing', and won't actually be reflected on any mirror until the next updates compose/push is done for that release. Bill -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
