On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 23:05:04 -0700 Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 01:26 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > On 06/06/2013 01:15 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Eh, it didn't really seem that significant to me, and it ought to > > > be pretty obvious...but you can throw a needs_release_note flag > > > on the bug if you like. > > Not on its own but along with the rest of the changes, it should be > > documented. This is sort of thing reviewers tend to notice and > > users might be surprised by. I am not sure the installation beat > > was covered at all in this cycle. and I don't know the relevant bug > > here but please tag them as appropriate. > > oh jeez, it might just be better if I write something up, remembering > all the bug IDs would be fun...i'll throw it at my todo list. FYI, for the curious... Fedora Infrastructure is running the service this uses. It's a simple wsgi script with geoip-geolite: https://github.com/mdomsch/geoip-city-wsgi It does not work for ipv6 addresses, but otherwise seems to work ok. Happy to provide or track down more info on it if anyone has questions. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test