See bottom... Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
let me hijack ... does the strenght meter still think that a correct horse battery stapple-like password is weak? K. Dne Út 21. května 2013 12:43:30, Adam Williamson napsal(a): > On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 21:41 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: > > On 21.05.2013 21:36, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 21:35 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: > > >> Is it a bug or intentional design? In Anaconda, when you create root > > >> password it is not checked for complexity but password for regular user > > >> account is. > > > > > > Um, I'm pretty sure it is checked. It may not follow precisely the same > > > rules as other checks, I guess, but I get a warning when I use '111111' > > > that it's a palindrome. > > > > OK, I see it now, but for regular user there is this "progress bar like" > > indicator which tells you how strong is your password. For root I only > > get textual warning. > > Ah, I see what you mean. Yeah, it seems reasonable to add that for root, > since as you say, it shows up for the user spoke (and you also get the > strength meter for the encryption passphrase, if you select encryption). > File a bug? -- Karel Volný QE BaseOs/Daemons Team Red Hat Czech, Brno tel. +420 532294274 (RH: +420 532294111 ext. 8262074) xmpp kavol@xxxxxxxxx :: "Never attribute to malice what can :: easily be explained by stupidity." -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test Hi everyone, Could we please keep to bottle-posting? This kind of forces the reader to read the entire post and get the context
| ||
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
