On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 13:29 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964828 > > > I don't see a criteria related to the breaking of a prior bootable > system. Is there one? It seems really non-ideal for the installation > of a system to break the bootability of the previous system, so I'm > proposing it for freeze exception. There isn't an explicit criterion, no. I filed a bug on this long ago, but from a different angle: I was figuring we should be creating separate *EFI* boot manager entries for each Fedora install. That was https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759303 , and was closed as WONTFIX by Jesse with the comment "Not a scenario we're going to support." So this was basically 'by design', before. But your way of looking at it may be the better one, and an easier (and less likely to break, with all this NVRAM crap) way of supporting multiple UEFI Fedora installs on a single machine. Given the fact that the current state is really bad, and the proposed fix seems like it can't affect other scenarios or make the affected scenario any worse than it is at present, I'd probably +1 the FE proposal. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test