Hi! In the Alpha times, we had some disputes in terms of how to handle secondary architecture's blockers (in that case PPC). If we should grant the freeze exception same way as we do for all other composes that falls under "non-release-blocking image" or if secondary arches are a different beasts. As we are getting closer to Beta Change Freeze, we should clarify it, especially as secondary architectures guys are trying to follow primary releases as close as possible and there are limitations on releng side too (to pick up different versions of packages). Personally, I think it's worth to try to apply the non-release blocking images policy for secondary architectures. Seems like these "side" projects are now pretty alive (often more than current non-blocking desktops!), the community is now pretty strong, it has even marketing value and I'd really like to see more closer relationship with secondary one day. For cases where FE bugs could harm primary and blocking images, we can always not to pick the fix up to the final compose (even I understand granting FE semi-automatically could be understood as the must and sometimes it could be pretty tricky when touching important component before release). Sorry for bringing it too late, but still before today's meeting - so at least, it could be an item for agenda :) Thanks Jaroslav -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
