Re: New Alpha criteria in production!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



That's great! Thanks Adam!

On 13-03-18 18:07, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks. As all the feedback on the criteria re-design has been broadly
> positive, and it was voted on at the meeting this morning, I went ahead
> and put the revised Alpha criteria page into production:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Alpha_Release_Criteria
> 
> Couple of changes I may not have noted before - I changed all cases of
> 'supported images' to 'release-blocking images' to be clearer and more
> consistent with the 'release-blocking desktops' wording and the wording
> used on the blocker SOP pages.
> 
> I added links for each criterion to all the relevant validation test
> cases, in the References section. Obviously, we can also now add links
> from the test cases back to the relevant criterion. This should make it
> much easier to remember/find out what test cases relate to what criteria
> and vice versa.
> 
> I'll work on finishing up the Beta revision and getting the Final
> revision done this week. I have made some changes to the Beta draft
> since the last mail: made 'upgrade requirements' its own section (at the
> request of clumens), added a sub-paragraph to explain that anaconda team
> gets to define what 'available kickstart delivery methods' there are,
> and tweaked the partitioning criteria a bit, again at clumens'
> suggestion: we tightened it down a bit so we aren't requiring too many
> exotic existing formats/partition types to be handled, and specified
> explicitly that custom partitioning mode must be able to understand
> 'normal' existing layouts. As a reminder, that's:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_beta_criteria_sandbox
> 
> and comments still very welcome! Thanks. Of course, the Alpha page can
> still be adjusted. It would be good to have any major changes done
> before the blocker meeting on Wednesday; ideally we should not make
> major changes to the Alpha criteria from now on. Small tweaks, text
> improvements, additions to the metadata would all be okay at any time
> though, I think - things that don't change the _meaning_ of the
> criteria.
> -- 
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
> http://www.happyassassin.net
> 
> -- 
> test mailing list
> test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

-- 

Best Regards,
Tao Wu
-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux