> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:14:15 -0700 > From: awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx > To: test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Major criteria re-write / re-design proposal: Beta draft > > On 15/03/13 12:54 PM, John Dulaney wrote: > > > > One question: For the virt criterion, would it not be better to s/recommended > > Fedora virtualization tools/supported Fedora virtualization tools? It seems to > > me that by stating that only the recommended virt tools are supported, you > > might as well be saying supported. > > I generally prefer to avoid the word 'supported' as we don't really, > strictly speaking, support anything much. 'Recommended' gets the meaning > across without making it sound like we do tech support calls or send > refunds ;) > > It's also less ambiguous, I mean, we 'support' Xen to the extent it's in > the kernel and we have packages for it. 'Recommended' is clearer, to me. > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora > http://www.happyassassin.net > -- Roger. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
