Re: Major criteria re-write / re-design proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/03/13 08:17 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
I'm not fully convinced on the presentation style, I find the
collapsible comments to be more visible than the criteria themselves
(they are bold and highlighted, so they draw more attention), but
that's something that we can tweak easily.

I tried to come up with a few more designs of the collapsible comments:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kparal/Draft_Alpha_Criteria

There are four styles in the document:
1. transparent background, italic
2. gray background, normal weight
3. transparent background, gray bold text
4. adam's original - bold text on violet (please forgive my colorblindness, if it's a different color)

Ideas? The first one seems clean, visible and non-intrusive to me.

Thanks a lot for doing this, Kamil!

I think the bold italic grey is my favourite, but I think all three are better than mine (I think I just cribbed mine from the mediawiki example page or something). I'm fine with the 'grey background' one if that's what others prefer, so far it seems to have +3.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux