On 21/02/13 01:11 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
----- Original Message -----
We discussed a few possible changes to the blocker bug meeting
process
at the QA meeting this week. It was agreed that I'd draft up these
changes for list discussion. So here they are! Sent to test@ and
devel@
as QA, devel and releng are the stakeholders in this process: I'm
figuring releng folks are all subscribed to one list or the other.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_SOP_blocker_bug_meeting
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_SOP_blocker_bug_process
As it did these moves during F18 cycle, it makes sense. Also I hope F19
won't be such beast as F18 (yeah, hope :D). With automatic blocker status
for specific bug types, I think we are going the good direction! Thanks
guys!
Thanks for the feedback, Jaro and others. As per the discussion at the
meeting on Monday, I've gone ahead and put these changes into
production. So everyone remember to use #fedora-blocker-review for the
next blocker meeting :)
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
