On 6 March 2013 06:04, Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It broke for me. It was coincident with the change from kernel 3.7.9 to 3.8.1 but I didn't investigate if this was the cause.On 03/06/13 13:27, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:Can we assume you are talking about a "clean" F18 system? Any reason not to post in the "users" mailing list?
> After a routine yum update at omen.com,
> the previously reported mount.cifs breakage has spread from rawhide to Fedora 18.
>
> It gives:
> mount error(22): Invalid argument
> Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs)
>
> man mount.cifs has not changed at all.
>
> Is this botch breakage or an unannounced flag day???
>
> The bugzilla reporting tool would not allow me to generate a new report.
>
FWIW.....
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ pwd
/home/egreshko
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ ls silly
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ sudo mount -t cifs //silly/Pictures /home/egreshko/silly -o gid=egreshko,uid=egreshko,password=xxxxxx,username=xxxxxx
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ ls silly
2010_12_12 desktop.ini iPod Photo Cache Nokia tiffs x
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ uname -r
3.8.1-201.fc18.x86_64
I see no "breakage".
Adding a "sec=" option with either ntlm or ntlmv2 worked for me. Slightly odd given that the man page says ntlm is the default.
Digging a little more, a possibly relevant kernel commit from 2012-11-25 has the comment "default authentication needs to be at least ntlmv2 security for cifs mounts":
-#define CIFSSEC_DEF (CIFSSEC_MAY_SIGN | CIFSSEC_MAY_NTLM | CIFSSEC_MAY_NTLMV2 | CIFSSEC_MAY_NTLMSSP)
+#define CIFSSEC_DEF (CIFSSEC_MAY_SIGN | CIFSSEC_MAY_NTLMSSP)
--
Paul
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
