On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:02:33 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: > - it means that the report data doesn't contain 'installed_package' field > > - Updating to the latest abrt should help: > abrt-2.1.1 > libreport-2.1.1 > btparser-0.25 > > F18: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-2111 > F17: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-2124 How likely is it that the fix is incomplete? I'm running Rawhide and those packages are installed here for a longer time already: $ rpm -qi abrt libreport btparser|grep ^Ins Install Date: Fri 08 Feb 2013 09:14:47 PM CET Install Date: Fri 08 Feb 2013 09:14:45 PM CET Install Date: Sun 03 Feb 2013 02:42:28 PM CET $ rpm -q abrt libreport btparser abrt-2.1.1-1.fc19.x86_64 libreport-2.1.1-1.fc19.x86_64 btparser-0.25-1.fc19.x86_64 Last occurrence for the nm-applet crash is 2013-02-23. It's still listed in abrt-gui as "not reported", and trying to report it still fails in the described way. Should I simply delete it? And when ABRT will catch it again, it would save report data including the 'installed_package' field? -- Fedora release 19 (Rawhide) - Linux 3.9.0-0.rc0.git5.1.fc19.x86_64 loadavg: 0.12 0.15 0.14 -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
