On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:52:08 -0800 Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 05:03 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > > Hey Tim, > > > > maybe we should move the BlockerBugsApp from Fedora QA Trac to > > AutoQA Trac, so that test-list doesn't receive all these > > notifications? They are more development related than testing > > related. > > Tim suggested that to me before, but then, 'AutoQA' trac isn't really > the right place for it either, and autoqa-devel wouldn't be the place > for the ticket mails (assuming autoqa trac tickets generate mail to > the autoqa list). Is there a better solution? I'm having a look > around now. Yeah, as I mentioned in another reply, I don't think that the AutoQA trac is the best place for it either but our use of autoqa-devel@ has been changing as of late to more of a qa-devel list and with our current usage, I agree that autoqa-devel@ is a more appropriate place for ticket emails and development related discussion. I've been meaning to propose changing the list but that hasn't happened yet. I'm not sure that adding a new field for ticket submission is the best answer here. I'd almost rather move the tickets to a different trac instance if the emails to test@ are a problem/annoyance. Does anyone else have input on this? I'm probably one of the least impartial since I subscribe to both lists and am affected by emails relating to the blocker tracking app. Does anyone think that the development related ticket emails are annoying or inappropriate for test@? Tim
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
