On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 3:34 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hey, folks. So here's another proposal from an idea that was mentioned > during the F18 cycle. > > There's a few types of blocker bug that are basically no-brainers; it > doesn't make a lot of sense to waste time in blocker meetings discussing > them, and more importantly, sometimes they show up and we want to quickly > accept them as blockers and get the fixes in, but we have to try and track > down three people to vote +1 before they can be accepted. > > So I'm proposing we invent something called 'automatic blockers': a list of > bug types that can be declared AcceptedBlocker by any single person in QA, > releng or devel. That decision could of course be challenged and changed if > needed. Makes sense ... there is no point in discussion the obvious in meetings ... the return of common sense ;) -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
