On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 21:42 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > > Additionally, there is some history to Bugzappers as a separate > project > which was before my time, but as Johann has explained it to > me, it was > something of a 'I'm taking my ball and going home!' thing that > led to it > being set up as a separate sub-project outside of QA > > > .IIRC Bugzappers as a group existed years before "QA" as a project > existed but that isn't really important now. > > > Put those together, and it seems sensible to at the minimum > drop the > Bugzappers onboarding process. We can probably look at moving > the useful > content from the Bugzappers wiki space back into the QA space > at some > future point > > > Yeah. When we originally setup Bugzappers, we had quite a few members > actively triaging, creating scripts and so on for a while and I > believe it did improve the overall quality of the project and provided > a way for people to do some drive by contributions. We might want to > revive this effort again at some point. Matej Cepl and others had > some scripts, browser extensions etc to help out. Sure, it'd be nice to have some triage action going on again, it just seems a bit artificial for 'Bugzappers' and 'QA' to be separate things, and it doesn't seem like anyone's left who really cares about the separation, so far as I can tell. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
