Re: 2012-11-05 through 2013-01-28 - Fedora QA Meetings - recaps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 21:42 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
> 
> > Additionally, there is some history to Bugzappers as a separate
> project
>         which was before my time, but as Johann has explained it to
>         me, it was
>         something of a 'I'm taking my ball and going home!' thing that
>         led to it
>         being set up as a separate sub-project outside of QA
> 
> 
> .IIRC Bugzappers as a group existed years before "QA" as a project
> existed but that isn't really important now. 
> 
> 
>         Put those together, and it seems sensible to at the minimum
>         drop the
>         Bugzappers onboarding process. We can probably look at moving
>         the useful
>         content from the Bugzappers wiki space back into the QA space
>         at some
>         future point
> 
> 
> Yeah.  When we originally setup Bugzappers, we had quite a few members
> actively triaging, creating scripts and so on for a while and I
> believe it did improve the overall quality of the project and provided
> a way for people to do some drive by contributions.  We might want to
> revive this effort again at some point.  Matej Cepl and others had
> some scripts,  browser extensions etc to help out. 

Sure, it'd be nice to have some triage action going on again, it just
seems a bit artificial for 'Bugzappers' and 'QA' to be separate things,
and it doesn't seem like anyone's left who really cares about the
separation, so far as I can tell.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux