On Jan 27, 2013, at 5:25 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > liveusb-creator is graphical, hence the recommendation. At the time > these docs were originally written, it was probably equal to > livecd-creator in functionality. > > livecd-creator is considerably more flexible than dd; it allows you to > set up persistent storage and to use a stick without wiping existing > data it contains. At the time the docs were originally written, it's > likely dd was less reliable than it is now, and probably still had > problems it no longer does (remember when a dd'ed DVD would not find the > packages on the stick and would act as a netinst image, for instance). > > It would be fine to bring all of these more into line with modern usage, > I think. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810112 And it's so close to working. So do you have a preference on recommending boot.iso vs Fedora-18-x86_64-netinst.iso? I'm leaning to recommending that everywhere boot.iso and efiboot.img are recommended, to recommend netins ISO instead. Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
