On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 07:00 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > Images written with liveusb-creator are not UEFI bootable, this is > > > known. > > > > Well, I didn't hear about that, where is that written (no offense, of > > course)? At least not on the download page or tutorial on how to use > > the iso > > (http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/17/html/Installation_Guide/Making_USB_Media-UNIX_Linux.html) > > Here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F18_bugs#luc-no-uefi > > Your linked F17 installation guide, F18 is here: > http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/Installation_Guide/Making_USB_Media-UNIX_Linux.html > and here: > http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/Installation_Guide/Making_Minimal_Boot_Media.html#Making_Minimal_Boot_Media-UEFI > > I'm not sure why UEFI is just mentioned below "minimal boot media", > and also why they say: > "The Fedora Project does not provide an image to produce minimal boot > CDs or DVDs for UEFI-based systems." > because both boot.iso and DVD.iso are UEFI bootable. USB media stuff can get a bit messy - we have both the install guide and a page in the Wiki, and we should really do a better job of making sure they're in sync... > According to their wiki [1], we should file a bug for the > documentation team to amend their docs. I would assume they > automatically go through the Common bugs and adjust the documentation, > but maybe there's no such workflow yet and we should start it? > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Reporting_problems_with_Docs I'm not sure they do that, though they do seem to pick up a lot of things from different places. Filing a bug is the surest way to make sure it gets fixed. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
