On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 12:29 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey, folks. So the question of whether and how to streamline the > blocker/NTH review process is one that keeps coming up lately. Here's > some numbers I thought may be of interest in regards to that: > > f14 f15 f16 f17 f18 > alpha 39 39 46 35 91 > alpha nth - 18 13 14 42 > beta 44 78 81 99 178 > beta nth 11 20 32 35 86 > final 85 96 119 113 146 > final nth 62 58 65 45 99 > > total blocker 168 213 246 247 415 > total nth 73 96 110 94 227 > > total 241 309 356 341 642 > %age nth 30.29 31.07 30.89 27.57 35.36 > > Those are the numbers of bugs ever nominated as blocker or NTH for each > release point for each release going back to F14, which was the first > release where we had NTH (starting at Beta). Methodology is simple. Just > fire off this BZ search: I went back and added 12 and 13 just for completeness. They had no NTH, and they both skew heavily towards Final - I think people weren't aware of the Alpha and Beta blockers at the time, there are far fewer Alpha/Beta blockers and more Final blockers. But the overall totals follow the trend: f12's total was 264 and f13's was 205, which broadly fit in with the trend of total blockers per release. From f12 through f17 we have between 168 and 264 blockers per release, and excluding f14, it's an even narrower range, 205-264, with no clear trend in any direction. We're clearly not getting more and more blockers with each release. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
