----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> > To: test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 3:47:19 AM > Subject: Re: [Test-Announce] Election Results for FAmSCo, FESCo, and Fedora Board seats > > On 12/10/2012 10:35 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 02:40:54 -0500 (EST), Robyn Bergeron wrote: > > > >> Greetings! > >> > >> The elections for the Fedora Board, Fedora Engineering Steering > >> Committee (FESCo), and Fedora Ambassadors Steering Committee > >> (FAmSCo) have concluded, and the results are IN! and can be seen > >> below. > >> > > This came in as a surprise. So, once again I've missed an election, > > :-/ > > and I've done some searching to find out why. Has there been an > > announcement and where? I've started searching in the test-announce > > archives: > > > > | http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test-announce/2012-November/date.html > > | > > | [Test-Announce] Fedora Board, FAmSCo, FESCo Election Season, and > > | Fedora Board Appointment. Robyn Bergeron > > | > > | [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 release name voting Robyn Bergeron > > > > The "Fedora 19 release name voting" announcement is short and to > > the point. > > It immediately starts with the important part that "Voting ... has > > begun", > > then the details and direct links to the Fedora Elections System. > > This announcement has not gone unnoticed. I've taken part in that > > election. > > > > On the contrary, the announcement from Nov 7 starts with referring > > to > > a "nomination period", _no_ concrete dates, _no_ links to the > > election > > system, and a lot of text in an attempt to squeeze everything into > > a > > single mail. Is that the announcement I've missed or which I should > > have read more carefully? > > > > Same on devel-announce list: > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2012-November/date.html > > > > Could this be fixed for future elections? > > The "Fedora 19 release name voting" message is fine, in particular > > its > > subject is concise. The other one is a confusing mess. IMHO. > > > > We also need to see how many people voted not how many ballots were > cast > or could be cast and compare it to our contributor base to > effectively > determine if we are having increase/decrease in voting. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Voting_count_history <-- I just made this. It's still a bit rough, and doesn't compare with contributor base (this could be difficult to do), but gets a start on putting numbers out there in more of a side-by-side fashion. > > JBG > -- > test mailing list > test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
