On 12/05/2012 12:02 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
Next anyone of us can just explain instead that we are in the middle
of
blocker bug meeting
I don't like the idea that people should be put on hold, probably for several hours, just because we are having a meeting. #fedora-qa is referenced from https://fedoraproject.org/en/get-prerelease . People arrive and ask, because we advise them to do so. They might not be willing or able to wait several hours. Some of them will have their issues unsolved and will feel disappointed. There are a lot of guys in #fedora-qa that would be able to help them, ourselves included (it's very doable to be holding a meeting in one channel and helping someone in another channel).
Users that need help belong in Fedora and reporters that are at QA can
just participate in the meeting while they "wait"
I personally feel very uneasy about rejecting/putting on hold all these guys just for the sake of our meeting. I think we can cope with the inconveniences (of e.g. a different channel) much better than the newcomers can.
It was one guy why are you making so much deal out of this we have more
users popping in regular meeting on our meeting channel than we have had
all the times we have held the blocker meeting in QA ( and this is a
record holding release in the frequency of holding those meetings )
JBG
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
